Location and Level of Court Visit †Free Samples for Students

Question: Discuss About the Location and Level of Court Visit Answer: Introducation The hearing date for this case had been set on 13th April 2017 Location- The location of court is Supreme Court of the Northern Territory exercising appellate jurisdiction. Level of court visited-The level of court in which both parties have filed case is Supreme Court of the Northern Territory. Description of court process and players: This case had been forwarded to Supreme Court after imposing the sentence by the local court. Court process and players Initial Appearance- This was the defendant (Male)s first appearance in court. Arraignment- Defendant appears in court to represent whether he is plea of guilty or not. Trial- In this case, defendant (Male) pleaded not guilty. Therefore, there were several discussion and facts were presented. These facts were given to justify that assaulting a women and beating a female is not legal Sentencing- After considering all the facts and observation of these cases Judge of Supreme Court passed his jurisdiction and accepted the appeal against the judgment passed by local court. This case had been accepted on the appeal and facts presented by the female appellant in the Supreme Court (Sherman, 2015). Observations of court process and etiquette The parties in this case are appellant and respondent. Female party who have suffered with the physical assault had filed appeal in the Supreme Court by making appeal that the sentence which had been given by local court on the basis of exceptional circumstance was truly wrong. Local court had not followed proper process and passed his judgment. However, Supreme Court had accepted the appeal made by Female party on the basis of the fact that there was no exceptional case and physical harassment and assault is cognizable offence. Reflections on the experience This case is consisted with the judgment passed by Local court and how appellate could make appeal on the same jurisdiction before High Court. I have observed that the sentence given by local court to Male candidate is not justified punishment. There is clear given that respondent had bad track record and had been indulged in illegal activities since very long time. Despite of this fact, Local court has passed sentence of three months on the basis of Exceptional circumstance. Therefore, Acceptance of appeal by Supreme Court is justified (Lawrence, 2014). The key learning from this experience that you will take to your professional practice The key learning which I have gained from this case is related with the court process. I have learned how to make appeal and how appellate could make appeal in higher court. However, there are other several factors which have taught me the deep understanding on the facts presented by Female appellate to male candidates. This case study has made me to learn the court process, appeal process and on what factors Supreme Court could accept the appeal made by appellate (Howard, 2014). References Howard Jr, J.W., 2014.Courts of appeals in the federal judicial system: A study of the second, fifth, and District of Columbia circuits. Princeton University Press. Lawrence, S.E., 2014.The Poor in Court: The Legal Services Program and Supreme Court Decision Making. Princeton University Press. Sherman, B., 2015. Before the High Court.Sydney L. Rev.,37, p.135.